But this also begs the question: why is this facially unconstitutional case before the court in the first place?

President Donald Trump’s push to end automatic birthright citizenship was met by a suspicious Supreme Court on Wednesday, ...

President Trump attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case. A victory for the administration ...

The Supreme Court today will hear arguments on President Donald Trump’s consequential first-day executive order in 2025, a ...

Justices to weigh whether Trump’s order restricting automatic citizenship violates the 14th Amendment as the president plans ...

The Supreme Court is taking up one of the term's most consequential cases, President Donald Trump’s executive order on ...

In that regard, Sauer likened the case to the seminal 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which outlawed segregation in public schools, and the landmark 2008 Heller case, which declared that ...

Louisville agrees to pay $800,000 in attorney fees to Christian photographer Chelsey Nelson in a First Amendment settlement ...

India's parliament has passed a controversial bill that seeks to change how transgender people are legally recognised and ...

A federal judge has struck down some of the Defense Department’s strict controls on how journalists with access to the Pentagon are allowed to report — ending a policy that caused many news outlets to ...

(The Center Square) – The U.S. House tanked a balanced budget resolution to curb the federal government’s practice of racking up trillion-dollar deficits every year. The failed Wednesday vote comes as ...